Skip to main content

NOT THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION! Shining A Searchlight On Three Updates Of The Infamous Jewish Master Plan: The Zunder Letter, The Israel Cohen "Racial Program For The Twentieth Century" Hoax And The Speech Of The Non-Existent Rabbi Rabinovich

Item Preview

NOT THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION! Shining A Searchlight On Three Updates Of The Infamous Jewish Master Plan: The Zunder Letter, The Israel Cohen "Racial Program For The Twentieth Century" Hoax And The Speech Of The Non-Existent Rabbi Rabinovich

Published 1994

One of my better efforts exposing anti-Semitic propaganda.

Publisher Alexander Baron
Year 1994
Language English
Book contributor Anglo-Hebrew Publishing
Collection opensource
Notes This is a detailed dissection of three anti-Semitic fabrications after the Protocols Of Zion, two of them by Eustace Mullins. There is no pleasing some people however, especially those with diseased brains, and my researches into the works of Mr Mullins were branded "anti-Semitic" by Gerry Gable.

The third fabrication discussed here - the Zunder (or Sunder) letter predates Mullins, and actually fooled the Times newspaper, among others.

This pamphlet was published in July 1994, and is a bit scrappy. A second printing, retypeset and running to 14 pages, was published in August 1995.


Reviewer: blissentia - favorite - November 27, 2014
Subject: Alexander Baron's pamphlet is actually nonsense
Your "booklet" relies on excessive appeal to ridicule and is extremely vapid.

The only document discussed here that is likely a a forgery is the Rabbi Rabinovich speech. However, circumstantial evidence comes in the form of this letter:

"'Our Race Will Rule
Undisputed Over The World'
By Rose Rabbinovich
Former Zionist
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Hello Jeff,

I would like to thank you in the name of many in the Jewish community here in Melbourne for opening our eyes to how all of us Jews have been manipulated by the Zionists. Unfortunately, the Zionist are controlling all our synagogues and Jewish organization and institutions, even though most of us are not Zionists. The Zionists are endangering our lives. We are now being flooded with Jewish Israeli refugees who are escaping from Israel, not a single one of them is a Zionist, they have informed us that Zionism is dead in Israel. They also said that most embassies in Israel are now over flowing with Israelis who are seeking to immigrate to other countries. In recent years, more Israelis are escaping from sinking Israel compared with Jews who are gullible enough to immigrate to Israel.

The most popular book among the Jewish community here in Melbourne at the moment is 'Candle Of Light' by Thomas L. Fielder (a Jew). Dr. Fielder is an Australian War Hero, philosopher and Historian (This amazing book is available from M.E.A. Books, PO Box 248, East Caulfield, Victoria 3145 Australia).

On page 39 Dr. Fiedler mentioned to my surprise a member of my family, and I am quoting one paragraph here in full as it explains world events today VERY clearly:

My readers will find it hard to believe the following example of the ambitious, ruthless mind-set of the Talmudic Zionist philosophy.

This address of Rabbinovich was published in the U.S. Publication 'Common Sense', and re-published in the September issue of the Canadian Intelligence Service. Rabbi Rabbinovich speaking to an assembly in Budapest, Hungary on the 12th January 1952 stated:

"We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia or Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our control commission will, in the interests of peace and wiping out inter-racial tensions, forbid the Whites to mate with Whites. The white women must co-habit with members of the dark races, the White man with black women. Thus the White race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the White Man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judiaca, and OUR RACE will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples."

end quote.

This monumental book is probably the most important historical/philosophical book in the history of Australia. After reading it, I understood for the first time in my life our government, and how the Zionists are holding all political power in Australia via finance and debt. Only after reading this book I understood why our health is being destroyed and our individual freedoms have disappeared.


Rose Rabbinovich

Former Zionist

Melbourne, Victoria

The others fit reality more than the speech, and there is reason to believe in their authenticity.

You do nothing to refute the Zunder letter. The Zunder letter expresses a fact that is not so well known today, that Bolshevism was so Jewish that it might be called Jewish. This was well known in that time, although it is now forgotten, due to Jewish control of our intellectual sphere.

To see how well known this was at the time, I present British White Paper on Bolshevism, Russia No. 1, a very rare document that I have found and archived:

The relevant pages concerning Jews and Bolshevism are pp. 6, 23, 28, 32, 33, 41, 57, 65, 68, 78 - on p.6 we find a telegram from Sir M. Findlay to Mr. Balfour relaying a report by the Netherlands Minister at Petrograd, which says that Bolshevism was "organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things" , note p. 23 which signifies that the Jews had preferential treatment, as they were allowed to engage in illicit trading, while all other trade was at a standstill, note the documentation to the effect that Bolshevism was despised by the Russians, but carried out by Jews, also note p.33. document # 33 which says that most of the Bolsheveki were Jews, note also p. 41, document # 38, which reveals that the party responsible for the murder of the Romanovs consisted entirely of Jews, note also p. 56 document # 56, saying again that Bolshevism was a movement led by Jews, note also p. 57, The Results, saying that after the Revolution, Jews became the possessors of most of the business houses, see p. 65, The Terror, noting the persecution of Russians for thought crimes, and the fact that people had to pay intermediaries, who were mostly Jewish, before they could obtain their release, note p. 68 which shows that the food supply committees were entirely in the hands of the Jews, and that anti-Semitism was rampant because of the extreme misery that ensued after the Jews had obtained control, note p. 78 which details the screams of "Down with that Jew!" thrown at Zinoviev, and that the following couplet was placarded upon the walls of Petrograd - "Down with Lenin and horseflesh, Give us the Tsar and pork.").

Page 80 quotes Zinoviev as saying "To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist Militarism. We must win over to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of population of Russia under the Soviets. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must be annihilated."

Winston Churchill wrote an article entitled "Zionism vs. Bolshevism", in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920, p. 5 (pdf here: where in addition to everything else, he noted that "The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated."

Bertrand Russell was another observer, initially sympathetic to the rhetoric of the Revolution. However, The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell: 1914-1944, Little, Brown & Co., Boston 1968, p. 172 contains a letter in which he says "Bolshevism is a close tyrannical bureaucracy, with a spy system more elaborate and terrible than the Tsar's, and an aristocracy as insolent and unfeeling, composed of Americanised Jews. No vestige of liberty remains, in thought or speech or action."

The anarcho-syndicalist Mikhail Bakunin, who was very familiar with Marx and opposed him devoutly, likewise thought that Bolshevim (Marxism ant the time) was a Jewish movement, and made the most peculiar criticisms of it. This is noted in the following anarchist publication:

Stalin was also instrumental in facilitating Zionism. If you look at the following coverage of the Yalta Conference, you see that he admitted to being a Zionist:,9171,937135,00.html

Yet Operation Keelhaul forcibly repatriated Russians who attempted to leave the Soviet tyranny during WWII. They were then sent to gulags or shot.

Douglas Reed, in "The Controversy of Zion", wrote, in a chapter entitled "World Revolution Again" that "The fact of Jewish leadership was a supremely important piece of knowledge and the later suppression of it, where public debate would have been sanative, produced immense effects in weakening the West. The formulation of any rational State policy becomes impossible when such major elements of knowledge are excluded from public discussion; it is like playing billiards with twisted cues and elliptical balls. The strength of the conspiracy is shown by its success in this matter (as in the earlier period, of Messrs. Robison, Barruel and Morse) more than by any other thing."

He noted the existence of the document ''Russia No. 1'', and that later editions of it had censored out the documentation pertaining to Jewish leadership. He then said:

"Fortunately for the student, one witness preserved the official record. This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition).

These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprized 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People's Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919, were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly "Socialist" or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of "opposition" was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton. (In parentheses, the composition of the two short-lived Bolshevik governments outside Russia in 1918-1919, namely those of Hungary and Bavaria, was similar).

Between the advent of the Kerensky government in the spring of 1917 and the seizure of power by the Bolsheviks in November 1917, his duty was to report an entirely new phenomenon in world affairs: the rise of a Jewish regime to despotic supremacy in Russia and to overt control of the world-revolution. At that moment he was made to realize that he would not be allowed faithfully to report the fact.

The secret story is told, with surprising candour, in the Official History of his paper, The Times, published in 1952. It shows the hidden mechanism which operated, as early as 1917, to prevent the truth about the revolution reaching the peoples of the West.

This volume pays tribute to the quality of Mr. Wilton's reporting, and his standing in Russia, before 1917. Then the tone of the references to him abruptly changes. Mr. Wilton's early warnings of what was to come in 1917, says the book, "did not at once affect the policy of the paper, partly because their writer did not command full confidence".

Why, if his earlier work and reputation were so good? The reason transpires.

The narrative continues that Mr. Wilton began to complain about the "burking" or suppression of his messages. Then The Times began to publish articles about Russia from men who had little knowledge of that country. As a result the editorial articles about Russia took on the tone, exasperating to Mr. Wilton, with which newspaper-readers became familiar in the following decades: "those who believe in the future of Russia as a free and efficient democracy will watch the vindication of the new regime with patient confidence and earnest sympathy". (Every incident of Mr. Wilton's experience in Moscow, which Colonel Repington was sharing in London, was repeated in my own experience, and in that of other correspondents, in Berlin in 1933-1938).

The "interregnum of five months began, during which a Jewish regime was to take over from Kerensky. At this very moment his newspaper lost "confidence" in Mr. Wilton. Why? The explanation emerges. ''The Official History of The Times'' says, "It was not happy for Wilton that one of his messages ... should spread to Zionist circles, and even into the Foreign Office, the idea that he was an anti-semite" .

"Zionist circles", the reader will observe; not even "Communist circles"; here the working partnership becomes plain. Why should "Zionists" (who wanted the British government to procure them "a homeland" in Palestine) be affronted because a British correspondent in Moscow reported that a Jewish regime was preparing to take over in Russia? Mr. Wilton was reporting the nature of the coming regime; this was his job. In the opinion of "Zionists", this was "anti-semitism", and the mere allegation was enough to destroy "confidence" in him at his head office. How, then, could he have remained "happy" and have retained "confidence". Obviously, only by misreporting events in Russia. In effect, he was expected not to mention the determining fact of the day's news!"

The English edition of Wilton's book, though incomplete, nevertheless is illuminating:

Around the beginning of the book, he noted that "Nonentities, figureheads of the Sovnarkom, do not interest us. We are concerned with great, if maleficient, personages in the Red world. Most of them are still unknown outside the ranks of professional revolutionaries. A goodly proportion of the hundred Jews who came out of Germany with Lenin, and the hundreds who came from Chicago, deserve to be included in this gallery, for they undoubtedly held Russia under their sway. To enumerate and describe them would require a small volume. I need sketch only those who act prominently in the drama of Ekaterinburg. The most important were: Sverdlov, Safarov, Voikov, and Goloshcheckin, and the murderer-in-chief, Yurovsky. Others will be introduced later on." (Wilton, Robert,''The Last Days of the Romanovs'', London, Thornton Butterworth Limited, 1920., pp. 26-27)

“But why all these precautions? If the people are so anxious to try and punish their late ruler, why resort to all manner of subterfuges, both in committing the 'execution' and in acquainting the people with the death of their 'oppressor'?
The answer is a simple one: Sverdlov and his associates were not sure of the people. The reason of that is equally simple: they were not Russians; they were Jews. They were 'internationalists,' repudiating all nationality, yet disguised under Russian names. The Russians in their midst were dupes or dummies. Krassin might come to clear the ground, but Apfelbaum-Kamenev appeared for the serious work. What happened in London in 1920 is comparable in a modest way with the Red mechanism in Russia itself.
Taken according to numbers of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the komisars that rule Bolshevik Russia they are nine in ten - if anything, the proportion of Jews is still higher.
These men feared the Russian people, they feared the Romanovs because they were Russians, they feared Nicholas Romanov because he had been a Russian Tsar, and when he refused to be seduced from his loyalty to his people and to the Allies they resolved that he should die - he and all the Romanovs. This resolve was carried out when the advance of anti-Bolshevik forces gave a reasonable hope of sophisticating the crime and avoiding a just punishment. And so definite was Jew-ruled Moscow on the necessity of the ex-Tsar's death that a whole month before the murder the report persisted that Nicholar II was dead.

The Germans knew what they were doing when they sent Lenin's pack of Jews into Russia. They chose them as agents of destruction. Why? Because the Jews were not Russians and to them the destruction of Russia was all in the way of business, revolutionary or financial. The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov (who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out by the Jews Goloschekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yukovsky, is the act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.
The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain Russians: the 'burgess' Ulianov, alias Lenin, the 'noble' Chicherin, the 'dissenter' Bonch-Bruevich. The whole record of the Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov and carried out by the Jews Goloshekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, and Yurovsky, is the act, not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.

The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain Russians: the 'burgess' Ulianov, alias Lenin, the 'noble' Chicherin, the 'dissenter' Bonch-Bruevich. They are all mere screens or dummies behind which the Sverdlovs and the thousand and one Jews of Sovdepia continue their work of destruction; having wrecked and plundered Russia by appealing to the ignorance of the working folk, they are now using their dupes to set up a new tyranny worse than any that the world has known.
Sovietdom has consecrated three heroes to whom monuments have been erected: to Karl Marx, to Judas Iscariot, and to Leo Tolstoi, the three names that are assocuated with Revolution, Apostasy, and Anarchism; two of them Jews.
When the Jew Kanegisser assassinated the Jew Uritsky, the Soviets ordained a Terror throughout the land. Rivers of Russian blood had to wipe away the stain caused by a Jew who dared to oppose the Jewish rulers of unhappy Russia.” (Ibid., pp. 146-148)
“To bring the Tsar or the Tsarevich to Moscow would involve risks. The Jews were in a fright; telegrams discovered in Ekaterinburg show that they trusted none of the Russians in their employ. That is why the Romanovs remained in Ekaterinburg.” (Ibid., p. 153)
“In the autumn of 1915 there assembled in Vienna the representatives of the German and Austrian General Staffs to discuss a plan for the promotion of a revolutionary movement in Russia. It was then that all the outlines of the 'Russian' revolution were laid down; it was at that meeting that the leading actors in the Red tragedy were chosen: the Lenins and the Sverdlovs and the host of Jewish wreckers, who spent the interval between their engagement and their appearance on the Russian stage in the calm of Swiss resorts, studying and rehearsing their parts.
The money that financed the 'Russian' revolution was German money, and - I say it on the strongest evidence which can be corroborated in the German secret archives - YYANKEL SVERDLOV RECEIVED A SALARY FROM THE GERMANS TILL NOVEMBER 7, 1917, when, becoming Red Tsar of All the Russias, he had at his disposal loot unimaginable.” (Ibid., p. 155)

And this is very important - Wilton noted, reporting on the murder of the Romanovs, that,

"In the death-chamber there was a curious inscription in German, written by a man of some culture-not Yurovsky, therefore, but perhaps one of the two men from the Chrezvychaika whom he had left in charge of the house on his departure. It was an adaptation of Heine's lines on the fate of Belshazzar :-

Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht
Von seinen Knechten umgebracht.

He had omitted the conjunctive 'aber' which comes in the poet's line after 'ward,' and then, having first written 'selbigen,' had changed it to 'seinen,' feeling perhaps that these modifications were necessary to fit the occasion. Perhaps unconsciously he also converted Belsazar (as Heine spells the name) to Belsatzar. The writer was quoting a Jew whose poem expatiates on the overthrow of a Gentile sovereign who had offended Israel . The Book of Daniel is not so explicit. It says : 'In that night was Belshazzar the King of the Chaldeans slain' (Dan . vi. 30) . But the author of the inscription wished to make it 'clear' that 'Belsatzar' was slain by his own people." (Ibid., p. 118)

The significance of the ritual murder of the Czar is noted in the last part of this chapter of "Waters Flowing Eastward":

To appreciate the extent of Jewish power in bolshevism, note the following, written by Stalin – “In the USSR anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under USSR law active anti- semites are liable to the death penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30):

Rabbi Harry Waton stated that "It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth ; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside of us, but we must see him right within us."(Rabbi Harry Waton, ''A Program for the Jews and Humanity and An Answer to All Anti-Semites'', p. 148:

finally, I suggest people read this document, entitled "Red Symphony":

to appreciate the extent of this power structure.

The reality of Jewish Bolshevism is much too extensive to show here, so I recommend those interested in more information read the following:

Baron also defends Norman Cohn, and references him extensively. For a rebuttal to cohn's arguments, I suggest Peter Myers' work:,,

A full account of the controversy surrounding the protocols, is provided in the aforementioned text “Waters Flowing Eastward”.

Now onto "A Racial Program for the 20th century"

Your assertions regarding this document are completely disproven in the following presentation by Myron Fagan:

Fagan notes that he met Cohen in a banquet with George Bernard Shaw and Israel Zangwill, and that Cohen's pamplet was to be an update to Zangwill's "The Melting Pot". He then produces some very obscure details that we can only obtain now in the age of Google Books and Worldcat databases:

here you can read "The Melting pot":

Israel Cohen as listed on the WorldCat database as the author of the forward to Israel Zangwill's book "
The king of Schnorrers

wikipedia states that Zangwill was a friend of H.G. Wells, the Fabian Socialist. WorldCat sources an article written by Wells, Zangwill, and Shaw:

consider cohen's biography "A Jewish Pilgrimage":

looking at the snippet view, I found references to Shaw here:

and Zangwill here:

Particularly significant is the fact that Zangwill was a Fabian Socialist, Zionist, and advocate of World government:

Similar plans were also expressed by the Jewish Freemason Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the pan-European movement, supported by Rothschild and Warburg, writing in "Praktischer Idealismus".

"A Racial Program for the 20th Century" expresses a reality that is documented in Kevin Macdonald's "The Culture of Critique":

This is not the only fraud perpetrated by Alexander Baron. He has also written a woeful text defending the Jewish "religion".
To see how absurd his representations are, and how the tradition of criticism of Talmudic hate is actually established and scholarly, I will point out the following - concering the most vociferous critic of Judaism, Johann andreas Eisenmenger:
"[Eisenmenger's] book was impressive both on account of its size-some 2,120 pages in two volumes-and its tremendous erudition. ... [He] was acquainted with all the literature a Jewish scholar of standing would have known. ... Contrary to accusations that have been made against him, he DOES NOT FALSIFY HIS SOURCES. He quotes them in full and translates them literally. ... The question is how did Eisenmenger arrive at so darkly a negative picture of Judaism while quoting its sources unadulteratedly?" [emphasis added] (Jacob Katz - "From Prejudice to Destruction", 1980, pp. 14-15)

Others would be more forthright, candidly admit that Eisenmenger's portrayal of their hatred is fitting, and smugly revel in the fact. Ernst Bloch is admitted in several academic texts to be at the forefront of "revolutionary Jewish Messianic thinking":

Yet the Jewish scholar Gershom Scholem, recalling his meeting with Bloch, said, on p. 98 of "Walter Benjamin: The Story of a Friendship", "When I entered his study, I saw on a shelf on his desk Johann Andreas Eisenmenger's two-thousand page Edenkthes Judenthum, the most scholarly anti-Semitic work in the German language...In response to my surprised look, Bloch said that certain parts of it were the finest writings on Judaism he knew..the author had quoted and translated the most wonderful, the most profound things...I liked his assessment very much and when I acquired my own copy of the work two years later, I found it confirmed."

One modern source that draws on the work of Eisenmenger, includes relevant commentary for our time, and includes facsimiles of the recently released, uncensored Steinsaltz Talmud, is Michael Hoffman's "Judaism Discovered":

Hoffman's work is useful, and supports Freedman's contention that Judaism is Talmudism. I differ from Hoffman in that I believe that the Torah is also Reprehensible. In this way, I take the view of Douglas Reed (in his aforementioned text). Christopher Jon Bjerknes produced what I consider to be a very good source for those interested in Jewish racism:

This hatred is quite mainstream. I provide the following examples of similar comments being given by extremely influential Rabbis:

“Gentiles exist to serve Jews”: ... ?id=191782
“Gentile Sperm Leads to Barbaric Offspring”:,7340 ... 85,00.html
“Israeli Rabbi Preaches ‘Slaughter’ of Gentile Babies”:
“Farmer: Settlers burned my sheep alive”:
“Poll: 55% back rabbis' anti-Arab ruling”:,7340,L-3998010,00.html
“Top rabbis move to forbid renting homes to Arabs, say 'racism originated in the Torah'”:
“Prohibition 'Thou Shalt Not Murder' applies only 'to a Jew who kills a Jew,' write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur”:
“Jews Consider Hate a Virtue”:

These people are not condemned by our media. I wonder why.

Interested readers should now listen to Benjamin Freedman's speech:
Reviewer: Jonathan Price - favorite - April 21, 2012
Subject: The Jew is the great master of lies.
"Notes: This is a detailed dissection of three anti-Semitic fabrications after the Protocols Of Zion, two of them by Eustace Mullins. There is no pleasing some people however, especially those with diseased brains, and my researches into the works of Mr Mullins were branded "anti-Semitic" by Gerry Gable."

A) You couldn't shine Eustace Mullins' shoes much less refute him and B) f*ck, Gerry Gable, whoever he is.

Any and all truths, criticisms, and/or opposition to a Jew or Jews and their leftwing, anti-Christian, anti-White and pro-Zionist agenda and ongoing genocide against the indigenous Palestinians and a multitude of other things, is automatically branded "anti-Semitic." That's the Jews' only retort, and frankly, it's getting to be very, very boring hearing it. Well, Mr. Diseased Brain, I can honestly state I've never read or heard anything written or uttered by an so-called anti-Semite that wasn't factually or historically correct, unlike that of Jews!

Jews like YOU fear the truth and do everything in your power to suppress it. Well, too damn bad, non-Jews like ME, love the truth and do everything to SPREAD IT!

Anti-semite = pro-Gentile. Jew = Liar.

"In an interview published in the New York World February 17, 1921, Mr. Henry Ford put the case for the "Protocols of Zion" tersely and convincingly. He said: "The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now." He made this statement when Jewish leaders and the Jewish Press in America were fulminating against a series of articles printed in Ford's newspaper The Dearborn Independent during the years 1920 to 1922."

The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are one-hundred seventeen years old and they have (continued) to fit the world situation up to this time even more so than in Henry Ford's day.

SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)
Date Archived
Community Texts
by Alexander Baron
eye 303
favorite 1
comment 0
Community Texts
eye 107
favorite 1
comment 0
Community Video
by Alexander Baron
eye 223
favorite 1
comment 0
Community Texts
eye 97
favorite 1
comment 0
Community Texts
by Alexander Baron
eye 1,233
favorite 1
comment 0
Community Texts
by Alexander Baron
eye 233
favorite 1
comment 0